John,
I spent a portion of my engineering career designing products for inventors,
some kookier than others. Many wanted me to work sweat equity, which I did
to a small extent, but always retained fees for service. Most of them had
done little or no marketing of their idea and for the most part headed for
disaster just like I believe these folks will. I observed several important
factors that make up "the inventor" mindset:
1.) Most inventors want one (1, uno, 1) for themselves, they think it's
the best idea ever and as result they believe the rest of the world will
think so as well and come running to their doorstep.
2.) Most inventors don't have a clue about business or marketing and are
usually unwilling to learn or take advice from experienced individuals
offering.
3.) Almost all inventors are so paranoid someone will "steal" their idea,
they are very reluctant to even tell anybody about it.
I once worked with an inventor who wanted a lighted accessory for his TV
remote control. I designed a cool looking device and charged him $12,000
for the engineering. He then spent an additional $30K to build a huge
inventory, set-up supply chains, contract manufacturing and distribution.
Over a two year period he sold 23. He really just wanted "one" for himself
and invested $42,000 instead of buying a new $400 TV that comes with a
lighted remote control. Here, he had done zero marketing and now he's
blessed with a great stockpile in his garage, just like the "fish bobber"
guys.
I also worked with a building contractor that had a problem with his Makita
battery powered drills going dead because someone forgot to charge the
batteries. To be sure, it was a real problem when the drills went dead and
a crew of high priced carpenters stood around waiting for the batteries to
charge so they could drive their screws. He wanted to build a 110Volt
plug-in adapter, for just those emergency situations. We built him two
prototypes using state-of-art switching power supply technology and charged
him $15,000. He was very happy. He then went to build a bunch of them, but
folded when the price tag for production tooling was $100K. We thought it
was good idea. A year later Black and Decker came out with a similar
product, not near as sexy and only for their brand not Makita, which, at
that time, had dominated the battery powered market.
He really just wanted one for himself and was really not passionate about
bringing it to the rest of world or going into the business of selling
these.
I believe the "Motorized Bobber" guys have a cute little product. Even
their little story is cute and smacks of sweetness and Dad's helping Son's,
etc. The problem is they have a horribly narrow market niche..."little boys
who are afraid to cast fishing lines" I would suspect that if they want to
fish later in life, they'd better learn how. I also suspect this device is
useless in most fishing applications, like stream, deep sea, bay, dock,
etc. (only a smooth crystal clear lake judging by the microhorsepower)
This a terrific example of asking no one if they need it, assuming everyone
wants one and building the items with no orders, spending $$ on making a
bunch which most likely will rot in their garage. What's your take?
Mark Goldsborough
"DeDe"
----- Original Message -----
From:
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:04 PM
Subject: Trailing Bobber
> Folks,
>
> This appeared in the Wall Street Journal classified ads:
>
> www.trollingbobber.com has patented a motorized fishing bobber. With
70,000
> in inventory, we are looking for an investor or partner. 866-876-5546.
>
> If you have time, please go to the www.trollingbobber.com website and tell
me
> what you make of it...
>
> John
Friday, July 12, 2002
bobber critique
Posted in media by John Wiley Spiers
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment