There is no scientific basis to support the idea of global warming or "climate change" as a problem one way or another.
There is a nasty problem of pollution, which is undoubtably affecting the environment.
When Marxism folded, the Marxists needed a raison d'etre, so they jumped on the dormant ecology movement to host their predator lifestyle. They became Greens.
By making the problem of pollution metaphysical, they were able to pose the problem as one needing all of the solutions of Marxism.
The solution to pollution is property rights. One is not able to spoil unused parts of the planet, nor allow anything to cross over to other's property.
In anarchy, the sanction would be shunning, and any Monsanto strength pollution would no doubt be met with lethal indifference to the pleadings for health and welfare by Monsanto operatives. It is the state that gives Monsanto a pass to pollute, just as it was the state that gave Jim Crow a pass to create racist laws. In a truly free market, pollution is suicide to a polluter.
If property rights were respected, then automobiles, an invention, would include other inventions that collected all effluents to be packaged and sold on for industrial uses. In short cars would be clean. Or more likely, we would have moved away from cars and 1880s technology of mass transit into clean, non-effluent mag lev.
The state creates huge solutions for tiny problems, and then charges too much. By making pollution into a boogie man of "climate change" the progressives assure they will have a sinecure managing cap and trade style "solutions" that serve to make pollution an eternal problem and the progressives' sinecure eternal. Remember, cap and trade institutionalizes pollution.
Read all about how it happened.
To believe we can fix this if we can "just get the right people in office" is self-delusional. Step away from the false dilemma and act as though pollution matters. Stop pretending if we just make it permanent it can be controlled.
Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.
There is a nasty problem of pollution, which is undoubtably affecting the environment.
When Marxism folded, the Marxists needed a raison d'etre, so they jumped on the dormant ecology movement to host their predator lifestyle. They became Greens.
By making the problem of pollution metaphysical, they were able to pose the problem as one needing all of the solutions of Marxism.
The solution to pollution is property rights. One is not able to spoil unused parts of the planet, nor allow anything to cross over to other's property.
In anarchy, the sanction would be shunning, and any Monsanto strength pollution would no doubt be met with lethal indifference to the pleadings for health and welfare by Monsanto operatives. It is the state that gives Monsanto a pass to pollute, just as it was the state that gave Jim Crow a pass to create racist laws. In a truly free market, pollution is suicide to a polluter.
If property rights were respected, then automobiles, an invention, would include other inventions that collected all effluents to be packaged and sold on for industrial uses. In short cars would be clean. Or more likely, we would have moved away from cars and 1880s technology of mass transit into clean, non-effluent mag lev.
The state creates huge solutions for tiny problems, and then charges too much. By making pollution into a boogie man of "climate change" the progressives assure they will have a sinecure managing cap and trade style "solutions" that serve to make pollution an eternal problem and the progressives' sinecure eternal. Remember, cap and trade institutionalizes pollution.
Read all about how it happened.
To believe we can fix this if we can "just get the right people in office" is self-delusional. Step away from the false dilemma and act as though pollution matters. Stop pretending if we just make it permanent it can be controlled.
Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.
1 comments:
There's even a term for this, "Watermelons," and a book by a British guy on the subject:
Watermelons: The Green Movement's True Colors
Post a Comment