In example #28374636265 and #28374636266 of how government brings chaos and anarchy brings spontaneous order, let's examine -
#28374636265 -
A gunmaker says it will not sell to law enforcement any gun that is denied to citizens. This of course reflects the fact that the 2nd amendment is about citizens having the fire power to defend themselves from the state, not about hunting. They will continue military sales, which is and incongruent position, but it is a start. The reasoning is the practical problem of accidentally selling an illegal gun to a citizen over a mix-up when selling to law enforcement. (A cop buying a gun legal for cops but for personal use). Every time people tell me "England outlaws guns" I think English cops are not armed either. So the police should show leadership and disarm themselves.
And surely the powers that be know that gun regulations increase gun ownership! Every time there is a gun grab sales take off. And only the inner cities get gun control. The suburbs arm up. And the inner cities are heavily reliant on welfare. And if welfare dries up, there will be looting. And if looting the local Safeway will not be restocked. And if not restocked the inner city people will spread out looking for food. And meet a well-armed suburbs. Wait... could this all be on purpose?
#28374636266 -
Prohibition of liquor increased wine consumption. Say what?
Seattle Police Chief Norm Stamper eliminated DARE when he read a secret justice Department report that stated what every educator already knew, DARE increases drug use among the participants.
How come programs to make things better actually make them worse stay alive/
In the specific case of DARE, they keep changing it. Every iteration is proven counter productive. When challenged, the DARE minions, like Head Start, say "yes, but that is the old version. We fixed it. NOW it works. " Until the new version too is proven counter productive.
Darwinists use the exact same argument. "O yes, but that is the old version..." Even Darwin came up with about dozen versions...
There is a something about Darwin, guns, inner cities, drugs counterproductive programs... that somehow all tie together, and when the penny drops, people sometimes go berzerk. Caution, harsh language. I know how she feels, I'd like her in my classes.
Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.
#28374636265 -
A gunmaker says it will not sell to law enforcement any gun that is denied to citizens. This of course reflects the fact that the 2nd amendment is about citizens having the fire power to defend themselves from the state, not about hunting. They will continue military sales, which is and incongruent position, but it is a start. The reasoning is the practical problem of accidentally selling an illegal gun to a citizen over a mix-up when selling to law enforcement. (A cop buying a gun legal for cops but for personal use). Every time people tell me "England outlaws guns" I think English cops are not armed either. So the police should show leadership and disarm themselves.
And surely the powers that be know that gun regulations increase gun ownership! Every time there is a gun grab sales take off. And only the inner cities get gun control. The suburbs arm up. And the inner cities are heavily reliant on welfare. And if welfare dries up, there will be looting. And if looting the local Safeway will not be restocked. And if not restocked the inner city people will spread out looking for food. And meet a well-armed suburbs. Wait... could this all be on purpose?
#28374636266 -
Prohibition of liquor increased wine consumption. Say what?
Although the number of wineries in California fell from more than 1,000 to about 150, three legal loopholes enables wine production to continue. First, wineries were allowed to produce wine for sacramental use in churches. Second, wine was allowed for medicinal purposes. The limited number of wineries that did produce continuously under Prohibition owed their survival to these two exemptions. The third and most important loophole concerned home production. According to Section 29 of the Volstead Act, each household was permitted to produce up to two hundred gallons of "non-intoxicating" fruit juice for consumption by members of the family over eighteen.
Colman notes that this loophole allowing for the legal production of homemade wine was "a boon for the grape growers." While wineries had declined in number, "acres under vine doubled between 1919 and 1927" due to the home vintner surge. This led to an increase in wine consumption. He correctly indicates that federal enforcement was weak, and sometimes non-existent, because there were few means for enforcing these laws in the case of homemade juice. An entire industry developed in order to meet the needs of producers for their winemaking supplies.
Seattle Police Chief Norm Stamper eliminated DARE when he read a secret justice Department report that stated what every educator already knew, DARE increases drug use among the participants.
How come programs to make things better actually make them worse stay alive/
In the specific case of DARE, they keep changing it. Every iteration is proven counter productive. When challenged, the DARE minions, like Head Start, say "yes, but that is the old version. We fixed it. NOW it works. " Until the new version too is proven counter productive.
Darwinists use the exact same argument. "O yes, but that is the old version..." Even Darwin came up with about dozen versions...
There is a something about Darwin, guns, inner cities, drugs counterproductive programs... that somehow all tie together, and when the penny drops, people sometimes go berzerk. Caution, harsh language. I know how she feels, I'd like her in my classes.
Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.
0 comments:
Post a Comment