Then how come the top people spend so much time secretly talking about it. It does matter, in fact it fundamental, at the macroeconomic level.
If we have free markets in the USA, when people are discussing how to operate independently of the USA, how come they must differentiate their actions as "free market" as opposed to capitalism? Well. because free markets and capitalism are diametrically opposed.
Of course the bad guys call what they do "free markets"... that is just setting up the ability to blame the disease on the cure.
Note in these secret discussions, from the 1970s, wikileaked, how the USA counters it will manage the free market (a contradiction in terms.
But notwithstanding the importance of gold at the macro level, it is credit at the micro level that matters. And not credit from banks at interest, but non-interest bearing asset-based credit extended among small business in a countries economy. This lack is the source of so much USA economic malaise - unemployment, high costs, low wages, dearth of anti-fascist labor movement (govt labor unions are pro-fascist, just like the North Korean and Soviet labor unions)... if we can return to small business credit, we can recover no matter what happens on Wall Street or in Washington.
It was not long ago, maybe 40 years, when you could walk down any street and see a small business with a "help wanted" sign for a business in which you could advance quickly. Retailers gave their customers (end users) time to pay, wholesalers gave retailers time, manufacturers gave wholesalers time, extractors gave manufacturers time, as did truckers and so on... a huge part of the economy did not work on money, but credit, with no interest.
The credit card, with EZ credit and some interest wiped out sober credit at no interest. Lightweights could crowd in and offer cheaper in the market, wiping out quality, but going out of business themselves anyway. Enron is a failed effort at this. Ikea is a successful effort at this. So far.
Now, there will be some younger folk, socially conditioned in recent years, unaware there was life before they were born, who will object that charging interest is necessary, that it is a essential means of making money, and preserving wealth. If so, why during most of history and especially economically stable times, usury was negligible? it is certainly A means of making money, but not a legitimate means. it has always been outlawed because it does damage. Any and all worthwhile entrepreneurial efforts can be attained without interest being involved. If we want.
EZ credit is running out. The answer is not gold coins, but recovery of community based financed. Deregulate banking now. Regulations protect the zombies, who are killing living businesses.
Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.
If we have free markets in the USA, when people are discussing how to operate independently of the USA, how come they must differentiate their actions as "free market" as opposed to capitalism? Well. because free markets and capitalism are diametrically opposed.
Of course the bad guys call what they do "free markets"... that is just setting up the ability to blame the disease on the cure.
Note in these secret discussions, from the 1970s, wikileaked, how the USA counters it will manage the free market (a contradiction in terms.
But notwithstanding the importance of gold at the macro level, it is credit at the micro level that matters. And not credit from banks at interest, but non-interest bearing asset-based credit extended among small business in a countries economy. This lack is the source of so much USA economic malaise - unemployment, high costs, low wages, dearth of anti-fascist labor movement (govt labor unions are pro-fascist, just like the North Korean and Soviet labor unions)... if we can return to small business credit, we can recover no matter what happens on Wall Street or in Washington.
It was not long ago, maybe 40 years, when you could walk down any street and see a small business with a "help wanted" sign for a business in which you could advance quickly. Retailers gave their customers (end users) time to pay, wholesalers gave retailers time, manufacturers gave wholesalers time, extractors gave manufacturers time, as did truckers and so on... a huge part of the economy did not work on money, but credit, with no interest.
The credit card, with EZ credit and some interest wiped out sober credit at no interest. Lightweights could crowd in and offer cheaper in the market, wiping out quality, but going out of business themselves anyway. Enron is a failed effort at this. Ikea is a successful effort at this. So far.
Now, there will be some younger folk, socially conditioned in recent years, unaware there was life before they were born, who will object that charging interest is necessary, that it is a essential means of making money, and preserving wealth. If so, why during most of history and especially economically stable times, usury was negligible? it is certainly A means of making money, but not a legitimate means. it has always been outlawed because it does damage. Any and all worthwhile entrepreneurial efforts can be attained without interest being involved. If we want.
EZ credit is running out. The answer is not gold coins, but recovery of community based financed. Deregulate banking now. Regulations protect the zombies, who are killing living businesses.
Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.
0 comments:
Post a Comment