Saturday, January 8, 2011
MSM Lauds Armed Citizens
Posted in Free Market Violence by John Wiley Spiers | 0 comments
More On Free Market Insurance
We have such a hole in our understanding of how insurance once worked, and would work, in an economy, if it were allowed to do so.
First off, insurance has to be voluntary, this is absolutely key. No one must ever be required to buy insurance by any government. Now, someone financing the construction of a building may require insurance as a condition of financing, but that is different, merely conditions of a contract which one may freely enter or reject. Not only is it a bad idea, mandatory insurance violates our constitutional freedom of association and freedom to assemble.
Posted in insurance by John Wiley Spiers | 0 comments
Friday, January 7, 2011
What Happens After The Financial System Disintegrates?
Well, the game starts again. Those who have power in wealth, and wealth in terms of ownership way beyond their capabilities of managing it, lose that advantage. A skyscraper on the books at 300 million, becomes worth 2 million. The billionaire no longer gets his calls returned, because he too is busted. Slowly, but surely, the game starts again.
Unfortunately, those who were pushed form the top, or found the top gone as they got tantalizingly near it, lead bloody revolutions (never do the poor lead revolutions.) I wish there was a way to skip that step. A sense of humor helps.
Posted in busted, finance by John Wiley Spiers | 0 comments
Free Market Science Research
Here is an excellent article explaining how government funding inhibits scientific research and advancement. It covers all of the bases, but I would just add an example....
For the project I am working on, I initially conceived it as much larger to start, but found management and finance lacking... so I divided it up into what I could handle. One cannot make such turn-on-a-dime changes based on back-of-an-envelope calculations, since so many other approvals must be gained before even talking about adjustments.
I took a statistics class in my MA program, in which the first session the prof stated it was absurd to expect any of us to learn any statistics in the one quarter required for graduation. Therefore he would teach us how to be consumers of statistics, not producers of statistics. After teaching us how to spot good and junk, he sent us out to pick any studies we wanted (within education, since that was the degree) and critique the science (valid and reliable). Well, I was quite alarmed as my first assignment came due and I could not find any real science. I had tried from obscure but interesting studies to work done by the famous leaders in the field. Flawed all. I sheepishly turned in several reviews, apologetic that this poor student was either too dull to spot good work, or just extremely unlucky, and I said, "I just could not find anything that was not junk."
To which the prof replied with a grieved, twisted grin, "Exactly!"
I am reading a book on the French revolution right now, which I will review when I finish. One of the basic complaints was since all segments of society had been bought off, there was no innovation from any segment. France was fast becoming poor and backwards. The problem was "patents" at the time meaning monopoly of some sort, in this case on an activity as opposed to "intellectual property." Scary how closely we are tracking that debacle.
Posted in design, economics, free market, New Product Introduction by John Wiley Spiers | 0 comments
Thursday, January 6, 2011
What Happened To Forbes Magazine?
For the longest time Forbes was the only business magazine I read or recommended. Great stories, good columnists, excellent fact checking. Something happened last Summer, they did a redesign, and then ran an article by Dinesh DiSousa, a neocon hack, who trashed Obama and made wild, weird charges in the article. I'd never seen anything like it in Forbes.
It seems to have gone downhill fast. I used to subscribe to First Things, and journal of religion and politics, read it cover to cover, but after 9-11 it became home to the Theocons, who used it to mischaracterize CAtholic teaching on just war and obfuscate Vatican condemnation of the USA criminal invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan. It seemed as though First Things simply signed up with USA warmonger agencies.
So "Blame Obama" Google update:
About 18,300,000 results
"Blame Bush" Google update:
About 2,090,000 results
Ha! Who did more harm?
Posted in election fraud, racism by John Wiley Spiers | 1 comments
Big Society
The conservative government in Britain has put forth a manifesto they call "big society" as opposed big government. Now that strikes me as just the right slogan... I am not so much against big government as being for big society. That is to say, more like Hong Kong, which free market social structures take care of problems, not government. So let's see how UK conservatives view this, from wikipedia:
- Give communities more powers
- Encourage people to take an active role in their communities
- Transfer power from central to local government
- Support co-ops, mutuals, charities and social enterprises
- Publish government data.
Oh. "Give communities more power?" So the premise is all power flows from government. How about cut government programs and taxes concomitantly?
"Encourage people...?" How about just quit discouraging them?
"Transfer power from central to local...?" Didn't we transfer power from local to central cause the local tyrant was a bad thing? How about end government powers?
"Support co-ops, etc...?" He who pays the piper calls the tune. Whatever the government supports, will be beholden to the govt, not customers. How about get out of the way, and let what forms, form?
"Publish government data." O come on... you'll just make anything interesting or useful "secret." How about any citizen can come in and inspect any government files at any time.
And a national citizens service? You mean reintroduce corvee labor? Don't expect any improvements from the UK conservatives...
Posted in free market, govt regulation by John Wiley Spiers | 0 comments
Robert Reich On Public Pensions
Posted in finance, labor, Pension by John Wiley Spiers | 1 comments
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
Pretty Amazing Flying Car
It's about seven minutes long, but this is encouraging... what was once common in USA, innovators cobbling together a wonderful product. A couple of points... he'll probably find IPR will kill any chance of getting this to market, it is a fair-weather vehicle... and sadly he suggests it could be used for border patrol... arrrggghhh! We don't need border patrol, we need free markets and property rights! A side note to this, the inventor's missionary parents were killed by savages when he was a youth, and the savages raised him... at last that seems to be the story...
Posted in intellectual property, New Business Opportunities / Trade Leads, New Product Introduction by John Wiley Spiers | 0 comments
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
China: Gold as a Currency?!
The following is a wealth of follow-up opportunities, especially toward the end, a conference in which gold as a currency will be discussed. Wow!
Posted in Radical small business by John Wiley Spiers | 0 comments
Set The Insurance People Free!
A wonderful development in the history of free markets is insurance. By pooling risks, we can advance division of labor because loss is lessened individually when loss is shared communitarily. When insurance was voluntary we had tremendous innovation and wealth expansion.
There is nothing in the left liberal progressive agenda, or in the right wing conservative agenda, in which government is the answer, that is not better handled at a lower price than by insurance. Food safety is a matter of standards set by insurance companies that have to pay out if someone dies. Construction integrity, safety and efficiency is a matter of insurance companies deciding what they will or will not cover. Police and fire protection is better and cheaper when insurance companies provide it to arbitrage risk and make money on loss dropping faster than premiums.
The welfare and war-mongers work from the premise that being a government worker metamorphizes a person into a saint, and well worth the money. Sadly this is not true.
Let's get back to housing for a second. When my house was worth 1.7 million, the insurance company would only insure it for $850,000. How come? Because that is all it was worth. The insurance companies, with their massive financial resources, are well aware of boom and bust cycles. And being born in international trade, ocean shipping, the insurance industry has always refused to insurance anything more that it is worth, for the simple reason, over-insured property (or over-valued) is a moral hazard, begging for fraud.
Now, to advance the war-and-welfare mongers progressive agenda, insurance had to be hamstrung to be an ineffective provider, the government had to take a monopoly on insurance. So far they have monopolized flood insurance, workmans' comp, social security and countless other plans. Anything else in insurance is so highly regulated as to be ineffective, and a cause of antipathy misdirected from the insured to the captive insurers.
Now the evil money lenders have a problem. Yes they bought and paid for the USA government, but the insurance companies, expert at statistics, have proved they were burned by the banks. You and I have neither the skill nor money to establish this. The insurance industry does. The insurance industry also has massive amounts of money it invests in many industries, where the money is parked in case of disasters they need to cover with insurance. They too can buy congressmen and presidents.
The banking industry, the insurance industry has proven, burned the insurance industry (as well as everyone else, but we cannot prove it.) The losses are big, and the insurance industry is big enough to fight back. This federal fight will get interesting. If the insurance industry allies with Ron Paul to bring the banks to justice, then insurers will be America's saviours.
A reward for taking on big banks, and defeating the evil cartels, might be to re-establish a free market in insurance, a big step in re-establishing freedom in USA.
Posted in govt regulation, insurance, New Business Opportunities / Trade Leads by John Wiley Spiers | 0 comments
Monday, January 3, 2011
No Solution Without Falling Prices
Until and unless we see prices falling precipitously, almost all prices, we will not have the correction we need to clear out and start over. The bank bailouts were to prevent the price of financial stocks to drop, wiping out an unsustainable banking segment, which in turn would have benefited the sustainable banking segment, and we'd be well on our way to recovery. We are now well on our way to more woe and likely war.
People assume China is in trouble for the same reason USA is, monkey business interest rates and printing too much currency. They will get into trouble too. Of course, but so what. China will go down financially when USA goes down, but China will have manufacturing capacity, skilled labor, industry and credit. USA will be a world-leader in searching luggage. Our other technology, self-reporting internet, anyone can copy and will. If we get into war, China has whole cities, empty, ready to populate if they lose any.
China is not trapped by what we owe them. I haven't heard a single person ever say this, but it is clear to me they are taking that USA debt, which is negotiable, and investing it around the world. If and when the system goes down, and it will, we'll know because we'll see prices falling, the usa bonds China "owns" will be worthless. But who cares, the bonds back infrastructure projects world wide, all pointing to China trade. Any chance of USA trying to make claim that a Peruvian railroad is owned by USA due to it being back by USA bonds will be as doubtful as a USA bank trying to foreclose on a USA homeowner. Prove it. When USA has nothing to offer, and trade with China pays, then the bonds are irrelevant. Peru will trade with China.
Because we constantly renew unemployment benefits, staff pretend work like TSA, FDA, DEA, USDA, etc, and bail out, bail out, bail out... the drop and devastation will be exponentially worse than it has to be. The longer we wait, the worse it gets.
We have horrible overcapacity and malinvestment in USA. We could judo flip the Chinese right now by announcing we are withdrawing troops worldwide, and dropping our subsidies and restrictions, re-embracing free markets, cutting taxes concomitantly. Now, warmongers will scream "this is isolationism..." No, just USA will return to when we engaged people worldwide as small business, person to person, not militarily, as in death from the sky. It is the warmongers of the last 100 years that caused USA isolation in the world today.
Of course, since we measure GDP or "wealth" in terms of how much money each person spends, including government workers, a period of fewer government workers, and widespread falling prices as people re-allocate to genuine market needs, USA would appear to be terribly poor while in fact it was recovering.
A free market assumes private currency, in in such a regime there would be no way to subsidize huge taxpayer ripoff payments to big pharma, big computer, big auto, etc. Those industries would die, as news replacements flowered. Unemployment would drop to near zero.
When we get back to wealth defined in terms of access to ever-expanding goods and services made possible by free market division of labor, we'll see we are getting ever better off. Now, we are told, as things are getting worse, that the models shows we are getting better off.
In USA, people spend about 10 billion a year on professional sports, 10 billion a year on porn, 10 billion a year on video games. None of these would likely be any where near what they each are, if they actually had to pay for the means of delivering their product (or is it a service.) At the same time, the time spent by people viewing what they buy for those billions, crowds out time spent on better options, like a good musical or a high school sporting event. (It really is quite good, and only 90 seconds, check it out.)
Of course, too many people want the security of monday night football, tuesday night porn, wednesday night video game, obviously, to change anything.
So we need to carve out a part of USA for those who wish to do business in a free market. A place were prices can fall, and recovery can happen.
Posted in falling prices, free market by John Wiley Spiers | 1 comments