The Bush administration had a policy of pushing food stamps on Mexican Americans. Today the Drudge Report blames the 2004 program on Obama. Somehow, Obama handlers set up a meeting, in spite f the world troubles, for Obama with Jerry Springer. Obama HAS to know he is a patsy.
Let's check in on google returns:
Blame Bush 3.8 million hits. 8 years in office.
Blame Obama 133 million hits. 4 years in office.
And for those who do not like big government, Pres. Obama is the first president to keep govt growth in check. Didn't know that, did you? First President since Truman to keep the increase under 30%. Obama has had a mere 15%.
It is all theatre.
Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.
Let's check in on google returns:
Blame Bush 3.8 million hits. 8 years in office.
Blame Obama 133 million hits. 4 years in office.
And for those who do not like big government, Pres. Obama is the first president to keep govt growth in check. Didn't know that, did you? First President since Truman to keep the increase under 30%. Obama has had a mere 15%.
It is all theatre.
Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.
7 comments:
Alright, but what about the $13+ trillions that have been printed during his term yet no one knew about it?
I guess the only reason statistics show that the gov't grew only 15% during his term is because the other % growth wasn't done in the open.
Printed...and spent? Or printed and parked in Treasury at .25 % in a move to slowly recapitalize the banks, while ripping off the middle class and poor. But isn't that the FED doing that, an independent banker own monopoly? I think if the $13 tril was spent we'd see some bigger budget numbers.
If the dollars being printed are being held in treasuries, is hyperinflation less likely to occur? What do you think the chances are that we will see hyperinflation in the U.S (i.e., like in Wiemar Germany in the early 1920's, and Zimbabwe, etc.)? Hyperinflation is what concerns me the most.
Reading Mish Shedlock, parking the money is why hyperinflation has not incurred. AS Sennholz said, the powers that be just have too many options still to play... since credit means faith, as long as USA has no rational limit to extinguishing its obligations to the main beneficiaries, pensioners and welfare, it will always maintain its credibility by squeezing beneficiaries. And to whom will the turn when it hurts? No where. Start your own business. Never retire.
Also check out:
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/09/randy-wray-helicopter-ben-–-how-modern-money-theory-responds-to-hyperinflation-hyperventilators.html
From Randal Wray (a prof. of econ.) states: "the prospects for inflation have not been smaller since 1930."
Your numbers did not sound right. They are static. I think this is what you want. Blame Obama is too small to be measured.... http://www.google.com/trends/?q=blame+bush,+blame+obama&date=all&geo=all&ctab=0&sort=1&sa=N
Now hang on... I took a stat course in my master's program, and the prof said no way you'll learn anything functional in just one quarter. So I'll teach you how to consume stats, spot good and bad.
What you are citing is good stats of search terms, what I am citing is articles on a topic. Two completely different things. So when you say I am using static numbers, I am surely a static baseline (the same terms) and over the last two years, it has been astonishing at how the number of articles has been growing exponentially.
It would be good to have a real stats prof address my assertion and test it for validity and reliability. My point is just how blatant the process of we being "had" is, and how we are being socially conditioned into class and race conflict.
Part of business start-up is a personal transformation from falling for this stuff to thinking for yourself. And thanks for the comment, you may be right. I pose make my points hoping to get a view I had not thought of.
Post a Comment