Geo Soros, who has bought and paid for the Occupy Movement, "predicts" a riot among his minions in the Movement. Well, isn't that why he paid for them?
Capitalism provides for concentration of wealth from the savings of many into the hands of a few. The means are fractional reserve banking and usury (love of money is the root of all evil, and Soros is money.) People do not care for impoverishment, even when impoverishment is condign punishment for participating in a system they know is wrong.
In any event, Capitalism is legitimized and protected by the state, which has a monopoly on violence. For the dollar to remain the reserve currency, and for Soros, whose wealth is reckoned in dollars to remain "rich", USA must make clear to the rest of the world that not only can it extend its power, but more importantly, it maintains control over the USA taxpayers.
When all debts, public and private, can be paid (and can only be paid) in our monopoly currency, all wealth is defined in terms of USA money. AS long as the USA govt can credibly maintain it can tax the American people to back any debt, then our money remains good, more or less. At the point that is called into question, then our system falters. See Greece.
Greece is spending huge amounts on weapons and security systems. So is USA. Instead of freedom, we are building camps, wiring borders and setting up walls for precisely the same reasons, in the same order, that East Germany used for building the Berlin Wall.
That the state is ready, willing and able to employ violence is a common youtube theme. But for people concerned with wealth, as in their own, proof that USA will crack down hard on any dissent is welcome.
That the Occupy people will turn violent would show the resolve of our government when it cracks down good and hard. The wealthy will rest easy. For the rich, violence in the streets cannot come soon enough, and the satisfactorily violent response, in these uncertain times. And if it does not come soon enough, the FBI is there to provoke violence where otherwise there would be none.
Anyone who advocates or takes part in violence is working for the bad guys. Whether or not he who makes the suggestion works for the govt. After violence, it only gets worse.
Capitalism provides for concentration of wealth from the savings of many into the hands of a few. The means are fractional reserve banking and usury (love of money is the root of all evil, and Soros is money.) People do not care for impoverishment, even when impoverishment is condign punishment for participating in a system they know is wrong.
In any event, Capitalism is legitimized and protected by the state, which has a monopoly on violence. For the dollar to remain the reserve currency, and for Soros, whose wealth is reckoned in dollars to remain "rich", USA must make clear to the rest of the world that not only can it extend its power, but more importantly, it maintains control over the USA taxpayers.
When all debts, public and private, can be paid (and can only be paid) in our monopoly currency, all wealth is defined in terms of USA money. AS long as the USA govt can credibly maintain it can tax the American people to back any debt, then our money remains good, more or less. At the point that is called into question, then our system falters. See Greece.
Greece is spending huge amounts on weapons and security systems. So is USA. Instead of freedom, we are building camps, wiring borders and setting up walls for precisely the same reasons, in the same order, that East Germany used for building the Berlin Wall.
That the state is ready, willing and able to employ violence is a common youtube theme. But for people concerned with wealth, as in their own, proof that USA will crack down hard on any dissent is welcome.
That the Occupy people will turn violent would show the resolve of our government when it cracks down good and hard. The wealthy will rest easy. For the rich, violence in the streets cannot come soon enough, and the satisfactorily violent response, in these uncertain times. And if it does not come soon enough, the FBI is there to provoke violence where otherwise there would be none.
Anyone who advocates or takes part in violence is working for the bad guys. Whether or not he who makes the suggestion works for the govt. After violence, it only gets worse.
0 comments:
Post a Comment