Saturday, February 16, 2013

15 Point Start Up Advice

What is the secret of small business?  

"You've given us vital information - you've saved us time, energy, frustration and money. We'll be consulting you further!
Jan Dean, Bothell, WA"

A. Customers: Compete on design, not price.  Your main customer base is always local, see item B, paragraph 3.

B. Product or service: Those businesses you see thriving started with the owner experiencing a problem.  All economic activity starts with dissatisfaction.  Your market activity starts with your dissatisfaction.  Everyone talks passion, which is Greek for “to suffer.”  But passion is not enough, people forget the other half to success: joy.  The winning combination is suffering and joy together.  This makes you unbeatable in your chosen field.

This proves to be tricky, so we take you through this process, so you can know and understand it.  Once you have that down, you can proceed.  In fact, get that right, and the rest is fun or easy, and sometimes both.

From there, as an overview, you will employ the sunk cost of excess production capacity with its attendant management, rather than raise capital and invest in the means of production. Check everywhere in the world for the best source.  If you find it overseas, you import and sell locally.  if you find it in USA, you make it here and sell it here.  And since you have found the best place locally, you export it as well.  Either way, small business is mainly local, and has an international dimension.

Those businesses you see thriving know these two secrets. And keeping these principles central, they get going sooner, fecund, better at lower cost.

There is a difference between big business and small business.  practices and principles   You need to know and understand these to save time and money (you can learn them on your own, but it takes time to relearn what others have already taught for thousands of years.  Here the teachings are gathered for you, and laid out in a logical progression from where you are now to business startup.

For example?

"I ran global product management, marketing and sales operations for several Silicon-Valley based, high-tech companies. Even with that experience, I learned more about international trade in your one-day course than in the last 25 years. It was fantastic!
Keith Blackey, San Mateo. CA "

1. You saw above we compete on design.  You’ll learn where to find the designs, and to stay away from where most failures start.  Big business competes on price, so we trade with specialty business, which do not compete on price.

2. Entrepreneurs never take risks.  Bankers introduced this lie to get you to take the unnecessary risks necessary to employ the excess credit the voodoo economics of Keynesianism affords. Letters of credit are no security in international trade, but they are often necessary. To know what they are is to use them properly.

Entrepreneurs militate against risk by gettting customers before we get product.   It is actually easier than the other way around.

3.  Money is gold and silver, everything not gold and silver is a derivative, no matter what they call it.  Most market activity is contract based, not money-based.  We grow balance sheets, not bank accounts.  At any time we can sell out for money, but while working, money is a small part of the game.  Understand this, and you learn how to “trade” as well as make money.

4. You can self-finance. Working capital is savings, not debt. Debt is slavery, savings is liberation.

5.  It’s not true that for every liability there is an asset, or more specifically, that the asset equals the liability in value.   Often there are no assets behind the liability (this is why banks need bailouts).  Knowing this keeps you out of trouble, and allows you to spot opportunities, once you know what your business is.

6. You need no licenses or legal form until people are sending you checks.  Forget about  what lawyers and licenses you may need, get your customers first.  Then you get only what you need to serve your customers.

7.  You cannot do a market study that matters, but you can earn money on a proof of concept, which obviates the need for a market study.

8. Our largest trading partners, import and export, are countries as rich or richer than USA.  Sales of Chinese goods in USA is less than 3% of the economy.  And even there, we trade with the rich parts of China.  Don’t assume anything about China.  The internet is less than 5% of retail sales in USA.  Don’t miss the other 95% by focussing on the 5%.

9. Never mind labor rates, it’s management skill that matters.

10. Never mind intellectual property rights.  Markets, not monopoly, is where success lies.  Don’t get fooled by the “sun rises because the cock crows” pro-IPR talk.  You’ll learn to manage business based on design, not bog down trying to control others.  Relationships with customers, not barriers to entry, are what matter.

11.  Never mind what something costs, or how difficulty or complexity may contribute to costs.  If the customers will cover the costs, then you need not concern yourself with such issues.

12.   You are likely a poor salesperson.  Embrace that.  Happily there are excellent salespeople who will gain you paying customers if you do your part, that is develop the worthwhile product, working with your first customers.

13. The customer is the most important thing in business.  The product is the most difficult thing in business.  The only thing you get paid for is the product (or service). Focus on this, farm everything else out.

14.   All products are solutions to problems, according to Drucker.  There is no solution that cannot be improved upon.  Bankers want you to believe wealth is how much currency you hold.  But the word wealth comes from weal (commonweal) with the sense of what range of goods and services do as many people as possible have access by their own means. Self-employment creates wealth, in the proper sense of the word.

15. Lifestyle trumps income.  You want an income to support a lifestyle.  Business expenses take time and people to spend.  It’s your lifestyle to have a business where you spend your time and money on solving problems that pain you and finding joy doing so.

All of these points take explaining, and may foster a desire for more reading.  You’ll get both.

A good start is my book:


"Two years ago I bought this book and have re-read it 30 times since. Mr. Spier's book (and online class) steered me away from some bad ideas to good ones and now my business is up and running, and growing. "How Small Business Trades Worldwide" is a phenomenal resource!
Mary Morrison Coral Gables, FL"




John Spiers und Mary Dietrich
Saigon, April 2010

And I have classes as well, linked to on the upper right of this page.

Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.


Inviting Invasion

Mish has two posts in a row that sum up world history.  In the first, he talks about French elite escaping to Belgian anarchy (relatively speaking).  In the second he talks about how Obamaconomics are making the rich richer and poor poorer (a point that should surprise no one.)

When in the course of human events, matters get unbearable, people act.  In one way, people escape to anarchy, and if not, they welcome anarchy upon them.  Recently, talking about anarchy, Belgium went almost two years with no government.    Panic resulted among other governments, because there was no discernible difference to the Belgium people: government, no government...  what is the difference?  Belgium literally had anarchy, and no attendant problems.

Now, as a Swiss-like collection of natural enemies living together in harmony, the "Belgians" (French and Dutch with a few tribes thrown in) have no sense of the national pride that leads to wars or "salvation through government" that brings a people down internally.

French politicians have invited the French speakers in Belgium to secede to France, hahaha.  What is more likely is for Belgium to declare war on France for the crime of "interference in internal affairs" and Belgium take over France.  Why not?  Cortez with some 500 men took down Montezuma's million man army, by means of an alliance with a tax-dodging group of natives.  Would not the French people welcome the Belgium liberators?  If the Belgians can be trusted with the little they have, might they be trusted with greater things?  Especially since the French are making a deflated souffle of their economy?

The story of Cortez and Montezuma and taxes can be found in this delightful volume by Charles Adams, Flight, Fight and Fraud, which I recommend as a remedial history book.  Delightful.



AS to the US program of enriching the rich and impoverishing the poor, like Montezuma, there is no logical limit to the idea that the state can be an agent of good.  Eventually the powers that be lose control of the leviathan, and it turns on the powers.  So we had the scene of the Ming soldiers opening the Great Wall to allow in the Manchu pony-soldier hordes to wipe out the Ming dynasty and start over.  A repeat of 500 years earlier when the Chinese welcomed the Mongol hordes to bring their anarchy to China in the form of the Yuan dynasty.  We have the irony of our profligate borrowing for defense spending will necessarily end in our defeat from a quarter that was never a threat.  And our profligate spending on "social welfare" will result in the masses welcoming the invaders.  This is inevitable, we just cannot know "when."

I'd say the USA is spending money on defense like a drunken sailor, except a drunken sailor once corrected me by noting a drunken sailors quits spending when he runs out of cash.  No barkeeper in history has extended credit to a sailor.  So on some unknown scale, the USA spend money on defense against other superpowers, when in fact we'll fall to some anarchic group.  Who?  Jamaicans?   Puerta Vallartans?  How about the Vietnamese?  If Cortez 500 years ago could come from the recently liberated Spain to overthrow what was certainly a world superpower at the time, why couldn't the Vietnamese conquer USA?  (Wait, they already did, with home court advantage.  Uh-oh!)



The Vietnamese have beat every invader since Genghis Khan, and apparently got more from the French than the French ever got (along with the fact that having been "colonized" be the French, Vietnam was free from UK, US and other major power colonization... smart politics.)

I can see it now:  The Vietnamese land in New Orleans, the long suffering cajuns welcome the Vietnamese and drive up the undefended  Mississippi river and dividing the USA in half.  West of the Mississippi surrenders and East of the Mississippi capitulates.  Ho Chi Minh becomes the most popular baby name in USA.



Ludicrous of course, but history is always stranger.  For thousands of years the black gunk oozing from the ground was known to burn, and no one cared, except the few who collected and burned it.  But for the last 100 years it has been the center of all human history.  Who saw that coming?

We cannot prepare, we can only position ourselves.  And the very best position is the one that best showcases your unique talents, and that is self-employment, better expressed as customer-employment.

Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.


Friday, February 15, 2013

What To Do In Meteor Shower

There was a civil defense poster back in the 1960's that said what to do in the case of a nuclear bomb.

1.  Take cover behind a heavy object.

2. Sit down and draw your legs up to your chest.

3. Place your head firmly between your knees.

4. Kiss your ass good-bye.

If this is just the fore-runner of a few hundred thousand more starting at 11:30 am Pacific Coast time, or so, then things will be very different after a few days.  My advice is still the same... start a business, give credit, but never charge interest.  You'll recover quickest.

If you survive.  This is good video...

And here....


Russians just do not know how to panic...  we'll show 'em if one hits here!

Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.


Thursday, February 14, 2013

The Role of the Designer & IPR

Since at the small business level we necessarily compete on design, we use designers heavily to make our products best.  there are several points to keep in mind.

1. All designs come from you, your passion and joy, as explained in detail elsewhere.  Search "joy" on this blog and you'll find plenty on that basis for starting up.

2.  I cover finding designers in my book,  How Small Business Trades Worldwide.  In it i talk about a contest at an art school for clock face designs, an example of "crowdsourcing design" before the internet (again, the internet has brought nothing new to business, it has ONLY lowered the cost and widened the access to communication and research.  Nothing else.) Today we have the same thing with 99designs.com, etc, something else I've blogged on here.

or kindle

 3. Designers are necessary because they have a skill we do not, they intuit the zeitgeist and translate it into your products.  You can say "ice ax" but they make it "ice ax 2013."

4.  It does not take much design to win at competing on design.  In the book I emphasize this, but I always forget to say it otherwise.  You goal is ONLY enough design to get a product that gains enough orders from customers here to cover the suppliers minimum production run profitably, in a workable amount of time.  Better design speeds up order collection.

Once your goal is met, you keep re-designing with the view of increasing the frequency of the orders coming in, with a view to making the same money on more deals...  never do we try to make money on volume, always we try to make it on frequency of transactions.

5.  Intellectual property rights (IPR) is evil in conception and practice.  Few things harm more people in life, and much of our economic malaise worldwide can be directly attributed to the USA intellectual property rights regime.  An IPR law firm invited me in to stand and deliver on this topic, and I have.  There is no valid argument for maintaining this evil construct.

Having said that, we do live in an IPR regime.  So like slavery, how do you work around it.  Well, you do not use it, and certainly do not abuse it.  Everything both designer and merchants wants in an agreement can be had in contract law, so forget about IPR law.  Just write and agreement in you recognize the designer as the "owner" of the design, and you are merely licensed to exploit it commercially.  In turn, you agree to pay a royalty to the designer.  End of story.  No evil IPR regime is in it, and everyone gets what they want in voluntary agreement, not the violence-grounded regime that is IPR.

The designer "owns" the "design" and I get the only thing that matters in business, the customers.

Email me for a .pdf on some pointers in contracting with a designer.

Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.


Silicon Valley Import Export Seminar

If you've wanted to get an intensive immersion into the process of small biz int'l trade start-up or expansion, then I am teaching a live, intensive all day seminar at Foothill/De Anza college in the Silicon Valley come February 23.  It's filling up quick...  and it is $89....  wait, what?!  $89!?  For an all day seminar?  Handouts included!?  Sheesh... I'll have to look into jacking up the course fee for future dates.  Register here at that surprising $89.00.  I'll see you there.

Contact Address:
Foothill & De Anza Colleges - Community Education
21250 Stevens Creek Blvd.
Cupertino, CA 95014
408-864-8817
shortcourses@fhda.edu
 
Class Information: 
Course/Class Number: 158/2416 02/23/2013
Class Title: Importing as a Small Business
Saturday, 9:00 am - 5:00 pm; 1 session starting February 23, 2013, ending February 23, 2013
CEUs:
Staff Phone: 408-864-8817



Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.


Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Hong Kong Men Free to Live in Chicken Cages

Anthony checks in on bad press for free market Hong Kong...  the problem in the first story is not Hong Kong freedom, but China constraint.  Instead of enlarging Hong Kong to enable more people to thrive, the WSJ wonders why there is not more land development in Hong Kong.

The best way to make housing more affordable, say some analysts, is to increase the land supply designated for housing. Less than 7% of Hong Kong's land is designated for residential use, according to official data. Woodlands, grasslands and wetlands constitute 67% of the city's 1,108 square kilometers.

Why?  a green hong Kong is lovely.  Why change that?  And as author Alice Poon notes in the article:

The government has restricted land use to keep prices high so that it can collect more revenue when it sells tracts, said Alice Poon, a former executive at a Hong Kong real estate developer and author of "Land and the Ruling Class in Hong Kong." The government's "over-reliance on land-sale revenue for its fiscal health is the root problem of its land and housing policies," she said.

I've noted this strange circumstance here before here and here and more. As to the author of the book, I've objected to Ms. Poon that her book is hard to get.  I await a reply.

Next Anthony shares with me the story of men living in Chicken coops in Hong Kong.  Here in Seattle we have people living in worse.

"It's not whether I believe him or not, but they always talk this way. What hope is there?" said Leung, who has been living in cage homes since he stopped working at a market stall after losing part of a finger 20 years ago. He hasn't applied for public housing because he doesn't want to leave his roommates to live alone and expects to spend the rest of his life living in a cage.

Which is exactly the story of the street people in Seattle, who actually do have homes, but according to a Seattle Police officer intimate with the street people's lives, they prefer the street.

"It's impossible for me to save," said Leung, who never married and has no children to lean on for support.

Yes, to never marry and have no children makes for a more fun and carefree life, but it also makes for foreseeable problems. To reward people today who partied away their productive years sends the wrong message today, n'est-ce pas?

Yes, for an anarchist Hong Kong is the best example and also perplexing.  No free market in real estate, but land distribution superior to anywhere else.  Maybe it is just it is so bad everywhere else...

Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.


Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Laws To Protect Us

In example #28374636265 and #28374636266 of how government brings chaos and anarchy brings spontaneous order, let's examine -

#28374636265 -

A gunmaker says it will not sell to law enforcement any gun that is denied to citizens.  This of course reflects the fact that the 2nd amendment is about citizens having the fire power to defend themselves from the state, not about hunting.  They will continue military sales, which is and incongruent position, but it is a start.  The reasoning is the practical problem of accidentally selling an illegal gun to a citizen over a mix-up when selling to law enforcement. (A cop buying a gun legal for cops but for personal use). Every time people tell me "England outlaws guns" I think English cops are not armed either.  So the police should show leadership and disarm themselves.

And surely the powers that be know that gun regulations increase gun ownership!  Every time there is a gun grab sales take off.  And only the inner cities get gun control.  The suburbs arm up.  And the inner cities are heavily reliant on welfare.  And if welfare dries up, there will be looting.  And if looting the local Safeway will not be restocked.  And if not restocked the inner city people will spread out looking for food.  And meet a well-armed suburbs.  Wait...  could this all be on purpose?

#28374636266 -

Prohibition of liquor increased wine consumption.  Say what?
Although the number of wineries in California fell from more than 1,000 to about 150, three legal loopholes enables wine production to continue. First, wineries were allowed to produce wine for sacramental use in churches. Second, wine was allowed for medicinal purposes. The limited number of wineries that did produce continuously under Prohibition owed their survival to these two exemptions. The third and most important loophole concerned home production. According to Section 29 of the Volstead Act, each household was permitted to produce up to two hundred gallons of "non-intoxicating" fruit juice for consumption by members of the family over eighteen.
Colman notes that this loophole allowing for the legal production of homemade wine was "a boon for the grape growers." While wineries had declined in number, "acres under vine doubled between 1919 and 1927" due to the home vintner surge. This led to an increase in wine consumption. He correctly indicates that federal enforcement was weak, and sometimes non-existent, because there were few means for enforcing these laws in the case of homemade juice. An entire industry developed in order to meet the needs of producers for their winemaking supplies.


Seattle Police Chief Norm Stamper eliminated DARE when he read a secret justice Department report that stated what every educator already knew, DARE increases drug use among the participants.

How come programs to make things better actually make them worse stay alive/

In the specific case of DARE, they keep changing it.  Every iteration is proven counter productive.  When challenged, the DARE minions, like Head Start, say "yes, but that is the old version.  We fixed it.  NOW it works. "  Until the new version too is proven counter productive.

Darwinists use the exact same argument.  "O yes, but that is the old version..."  Even Darwin came up with about dozen versions...

There is a something about Darwin, guns, inner cities, drugs counterproductive programs...  that somehow all tie together, and when the penny drops, people sometimes go berzerk.  Caution, harsh language.  I know how she feels, I'd like her in my classes.


Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.


Monday, February 11, 2013

Just Because


Photo

Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.


Horse Meat Lasagna Recall

I don't recall eating horsemeat, but I recall I had snake 2 years ago I think, and I've eaten cat, dog, armadillo, pigeon (it's just squab) and so on.  Eating horsemeat is no different that eating any other meat...   in for a dime, in for a dollar.

The first man to eat an oyster must have been very hungry.  We all eat things that make others sick, purely on a social conditioning basis.

But the horsemeat lasagna was supposed to be beef, and some think the "error" is actually criminal conspiracy.

I hope this helps people understand that the meat inspectors inspect nothing except sometime after the fact.  And only mass merchandising makes this mischief possible.  There is no upside for a local butcher in substituting horsemeat  when he may save 50 cents a pound for a week or so especially when the downside is a complete boycott and destruction of his biz if people found out.

One the other hand, savings of 50 cents a pound on a million pounds makes for a half million straight to the bottom line profit.  And if someone gets caught, well, they will be too big to fail so the sanction will be "admit no wrongdoing, pay a small fine" making sure it happens again.

The best defense against this is to rid ourselves of all 'inspectors" so people grow their atrophied skepticism, and look out for themselves, as they should and can anyway.

Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.


Sunday, February 10, 2013

Another Twist on VC & IPR

A fellow in a seminar yesterday familiar with Solyndra and other alt-energy debacles made an observation about the venture capitalists and their mania for intellectual property rights in the projects they fund.  On the front end, as we all know, it is about a positive protection of the idea so the monopolistic benefits may be secured.  This participant's observation was there is the back side to, should the project fail, some or all of the investment may be recovered by using the venture's IPR to shake down other players in the field with a negative use of the IPR.

Which leads me to wonder if there are cases where there are projects that are viable, but the csh that can be yielded from negatively wielded IPR is superior to the positive uses, and so plugs are pulled on the marginally viable in order that more revenue may be realized by the negative use of IPR.

Who cares, the system is bad enough, it needs to be swept clean away.

Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.