Perturbility rate, I first read about it in relation to a criticism of BART, the bay area rapid transit system, and how come it was such a costly mess... too much new...
Saturday, February 5, 2011
Anthony Inquires As To Pareto Principle
Posted in lifestyle by John Wiley Spiers | 0 comments
Friday, February 4, 2011
Selecting Product
In my courses I ask people what they would like to trade in, and why. Often the answer has something to do with perceived ease or simplicity, as though there may be some disadvantage to a complex product, like surgeons' laser blades, or one complex by regulation, like wine, or troublesome due to say fragility, like glassware. Esteemed are simple products, or cheap to send, like digital products.
Innovative products are necessarily using processes that are cumbersome, complex and unusual, in order to arrive at the initial product. Over time innovation in the production process itself may respond to innovation and simplification, but to start, expect complexity. (Complexity requires management intensive attention, hence less expensive management is key to innovation.) IN any event, to be an innovator is to sign up for complexity.
In business paperwork and hassles are farmed out, and the cost thereof is borne by the customers. Therefore, paperwork or hassles or both are never a factor or a consideration. The process starts with a problem you experience now, and then all flows from that.
Posted in New Business Opportunities / Trade Leads, New Product Introduction by John Wiley Spiers | 0 comments
It Ain't Your Money
Please consider this typical thought, expressed by a leading liberal thinker:
Now, I could not agree more. He is absolutely right. How dare anyone depend on the system, and then complain about taxes, especially since taxable are completely voluntary. Senator Reid is exercised for making such a claim, and the witless interviewer fails to follow up on a clear point. I guess you actually have to be self-employed to understand that taxes are legally avoidable, largely. Even Jesus, faced with taxes he explicitly defined as illegitimate, avoided paying them by performing a miracle.
Nonetheless, I criticize the system for two reasons:
1. All of that protection of wealth is directed at preserving a system that depends on exploitation, and necessarily keeps the pie small while it promotes extraordinary wealth among the few. In a free market competition would at once limit extraordinary wealth creation and promote division of labor, a better definition of "wealth." A bigger pie with wider access.
2. All of the people involved in the services Sunstein cites are unnecessary in a free market. AS we pile regulator upon regulator, enforcement upon enforcement, spy upon spy, we ever misallocate resources to sushi bars, hotels, entertainment, clothes, housing for these people who are not in touch with a free market.
3. With people oriented to this false economy, for more than 2 or 3 generations, people have lost the cultural capital necessary to start the banks, insurance companies, long line relationships, etc to serve each other.
In places like Egypt, when Mubarak is out, and then his successor is on top of the same system, overthrowing and settling scores will be the order of the day, not economic development, since no one on the ground really knows much about that. If history is any guide, either the same people will be in charge, or things will get worse.
Long before revolution, there has to be education as to how a free market works. The tumult in Tunisia started with college grad having a fruit stand condemned. The fruit stand is a good start, but there is much more to an economy. Not only does the govt have to get out of fruit stand regulation, but banking, insurance, medicine, etc. But for those to work beneficially, the actors must be versed in free market economics.
Until then, obey gauleiter Sunstein and his ilk, pay the taxes (which of course is a miracle) until you and your children are well versed in how a free market works. Starting a business is the start of the revolution.
Posted in Exceptional Wealth, Radical small business, taxes by John Wiley Spiers | 0 comments
Thursday, February 3, 2011
Christians & Muslims Together
Our criminal invasion of Iraq has subsequently led to a near complete wipe-out of the Christian Churches there, established by Apostles and living in harmony with Muslims for nearly 1000 years. One way to whip up USA warmongering is to attack Christian Churches overseas, so we can never really be sure as to who is planting the bombs.
Absent of government, Christians and Muslims get along just fine, as Will Grigg reports from Egypt. Warmongering Christians who support Israel are no true friends of Israel, but Israel takes what it can get, I guess.
Posted in radical nonviolence by John Wiley Spiers | 0 comments
Conversation With A Correspondent
"Sell to the masses, live with the swells; sell to the swells, live with the masses."
Is the implication to live conservatively, or humbly, although you could live w/the swells if you wanted, like Warren Buffet lives with the masses, in his little brick house in Omaha?
I want to sketch briefly the milieu of the start-up company. I break down in the book, following Drucker, the symbiotic relationship between the innovator and the conservator: the innovator introduces the new, the conservator lowers the cost and eventually makes the product or service available universally. Thus a free market (not what politicians call a free market) effects the introduction and just distribution of goods and services.
Yes, we studied this in business classes at PSU where I got a minor in business, which focused on the entrepreneur and small business. I'm going to recommend your book to one of my professors there.
We expect conspicuous consumption from the celebrity CEO people: car, house, clothes, libraries of leather-bound classic books, transport, exclusive club member ship, and the most conspicuous consumption of all: largesse, that is support of charities (I have so much money, I can just give it away...) We judge them by their consumption, our judgment a reckoning as to the alacrity with which they do their conservator job. We want them to have their private jets, their high level meetings, their vacation Islands, because we want our TV shows and our cool cell phones, and Fritos.
Not sure how their having their private jets, etc. provides us w/our TV shows, etc. I'm guessing you mean because we are willing to purchase the commodities they sell, we provide them w/their lifestyle?
While we judge these people on what they consume, these very people are most concerned about getting the cost of what they produce ever lower than what they consume
I'm not sure I completely understand the point you're trying to make here. What is the relationship between the cost of what they produce and the cost of what they consume? Are you saying – and I'm not disagreeing, only trying to get clarity – that we should be less judgmental about their consumption because they provide low-cost commodities to the masses – that although their consumption costs are high, they work hard at lowering their production costs so they can pass on the savings to the masses?
The innovators moves in a circle of other innovators, wearing their clothes, eating their food, reading their works, living in their remodeled quarters, often bartering but in any case far more concerned with immersing themselves in the creativity of what they produce than the cost of what they consume.
Is the implication here that conservators consciously consume expensive products to keep up their image, whereas the innovator doesn't identify himself with what he consumes, but with what he produces?
Posted in Exceptional Wealth by John Wiley Spiers | 0 comments
Snippet of Transcript From The Online Class
Posted in New Product Introduction, product development by John Wiley Spiers | 0 comments
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
China Does Another Judo Flip
The Wall Street Journal has an article on IPR, and US vs China relations. Mish Shedlock covers it well with cogent commentary. Aggressive force gets you thrown in judo, and the USA patent regime is illegitimate aggressive force. The Chinese are using our force to throw us. You can search intellectual property on this blog and find plenty from economists and patent attorneys explaining why IPR backfires and why we should eliminate it. Further, they explain why no IPR works best.
USA got off track when, of all people, Thos. Jefferson recommended a patent regime to the founders, but with a twist: the inventor owns the patent, as opposed to Europe, the first to patent. It has been downhill for USA ever since, locking USA in to an inexorable descent of war, militarism and big government. Not to mention as Bastiat would note, what unseen good has been crowded out by the bad. Check out Against Intellectual Monopoly, cited to the left.
Posted in intellectual property, Radical small business by John Wiley Spiers | 0 comments
Israel In A Desert Storm
Not only is the Fatah regime in Ramallah and the Hamas regime in Gaza destined to fall, but perhaps also, one day, the Israeli occupation, which certainly meets all the criteria of criminal tyranny and an evil regime. It too relies only on guns. It too is hated by all levels of the ruled people, even if they stands helpless, unorganized and unequipped, facing a big army. The first conclusion: Better to end it well, with agreements based on justice and not on power, a moment before the masses have their say and succeed in banishing the darkness.
Pretty inflammatory stuff. By Gideon Levy in the Haaretz Newspaper, in Israel. It is silly that such articles could never be printed in USA, leaving only the politically correct view or the deranged view as possible options. If you cannot speak openly, you can't be friends.
Posted in govt regulation by John Wiley Spiers | 0 comments
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
Anthony Bird-dogs a Good Resource
Stumbled across this International Trade law blog
http://www.exportimportlaw.com/blog/
This entry supports your theory on re-importing wine as long as you make no changes...
http://www.exportimportlaw.com/blog/2010/9/13/heres-a-spooky-question-about-9802-htsus-when-do-improvement.html
OR,
Can you sue the government for detaining your shipment? The answer is here...
http://www.exportimportlaw.com/blog/2010/8/15/can-you-sue-the-federal-government-for-detaining-your-shipme.html
OR,
It's illegal to import Iranian Persian rugs and food.
http://www.exportimportlaw.com/blog/2010/9/6/it-will-be-illegal-to-import-persian-rugs-and-iranian-foodst.html
Posted in business tactics. law by John Wiley Spiers | 0 comments
Monday, January 31, 2011
A Sketch of How it Works
Posted in Business strategy, Radical small business by John Wiley Spiers | 0 comments