Saturday, May 26, 2012

A Doctor On Insurance

Here is a doctor who shares his view from the trenches on insurance.  Now keep in mind that the word insurance means one thing in a free market and another in capitalism.

In a free market, the insurers arbitrage the savings from ever reducing risk through education against ever lowering insurance premiums, that is to say the cost of payouts fall faster then the premiums.  Your insurance premiums drop as you experience less loss, but your insurance company is rewarded with more profit, which they plow into new research in safety.  Yay!  Everyone does better.

In capitalism, insurance is about the actuarial tables and simply charging for what static loss is expected, 3 dollars in, one out in loss coverage, one profit, one to overhead.  Cover voodoo in health insurance?  No problem, we'll just adjust the actuarial table.

Make houses our of every more dangerous materials?  No problem, we'll just adjust the actuarial tables.

The good doctor points out insurance companies can also find profits in gaming the capitalist system by goosing the actuarial tables.  People "hate" insurance companies, when they really despise capitalism.  A free market in insurance is not permitted by the state.  As long as we have a state, we cannot have a free market.

Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.


Don't Bet on the Internet

The internet has lowered to cost and widened access to information and communication.  That is all, but that is quite a bit.


Once upon a time, many people believed an internet-based business was the way to go.  Not so much anymore, but there are still some who follow that delusional path.


A student sent me this:
***

BTW I was doing a little research on Internet sales.   Thought you might be interested in these stats:
Non-store retailer sales accounted for 8.7% of total adjusted retail sales in November (2011), versus 8.2% in November 2010 and 7.8% in November 2009. http://www.rosshunter.inf
There are 35,459  stores on Ebay which sell dolls
4937 with doll clothes
 As relates to some of the other students’ interests:
3888 sell sewing machines
2670 things from Chile
30, 088 sell clothes
15,743 vintage clothes
12,255 swim suits
17,322 baby clothes
9103 hand crafted items
238 walnuts
Only 78 sell pecan nuts... lol
***
  I see that some 92% of sales do not take place on the internet. So to concentrate on the internet is to miss 92% of the business opportunity.  Also note, for example, 3888 sewing machine sellers on eBay.  There are probably 120 brick and mortar industrial sewing machine sellers in USA.    I would guess that 92% of all industrial sewing machines sales come from those 120 brick and mortar industrial sewing machine companies.  

So 8% of sales from 3888 ebay sellers, and 92% from 120 brick and mortar companies.  Do you want to be #3889 going after 8% of the market yourself, or be a supplier to the 120 brick and mortar who have 92% of the market?

Sell TO people who sell on the internet, but don't sell ON the internet.  I sell TO Amazon.com, but not ON Amazon.com (to any significant degree.)



Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.


Friday, May 25, 2012

Smaller Makes for Bigger Bullying

Now this was an interesting comment:


Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Bullying and IPR": 

I find it surprising that by licensing their products and even producing it for others, big companies are much kinder than smaller companies who would sue you instantly for patent infringement. The same illusion is present with governments. You would think that local governments like City and County are better than the Federal government, when in fact local governments bully us the most.


***Very true...  whereas big businesses allocate nearly nothing in resources, relatively speaking, to IPR, small businesses mount suicide missions when IPR is at stake.  I mention this in my book and here on the blog, the most recent case being glassy baby


And yes, between cops, meter maids and inspectors, local government is pond for pound much nastier.  But I must say, with the TSA, the feds managed to balance the books very quickly.  Do you think as the Feds find themselves shrinking in influence and power worldwide they will up their game?***


Where can we read more about OEM practices? Also, where can we read about HP using Canon technology, Lincoln using Ford parts, and Bang & Olufsen using Panasonic parts? What makes OEM manufacturers license their work when they could make a lot more money by having a monopoly?


***To the left is highlighted a book by Bodrin and Levine, Against Intellectual Monopoly, and the the right you see under intellectual property 167 posts, some of which refer on to other writers.  Let me know when you work through all of that...


John
Please write more posts about IPR. As you can see, this is a very interesting topic and you get a lot of feedback from it. 
Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.


Marine Fisheries Trade & Data Error

The New York Times has a nice article on Marine Fisheries Trade which centers on the error rate in customs declarations.  In my classes I teach:



***Stelzer quotes Harvey Monk, the Census Bureau honcho who runs the foreign trade stats, as saying customs fails to count about 10% of their forms.... well aside from the argument Stelzer is making... what this means is the data you are using may not be accurate.  So is it useless?  No, because the sample is generally so large the implications hold.  The caution to take is if the numbers are low... it is possible the sample is poor and the numbers are erroneous.***



The article says:



“We were pretty stunned by the error rate on those declarations,” Dr. Rhyne said. “Lots of things were being called marine fish that are not marine fish, like goldfish from Thailand. It looked like Singapore and Thailand were shipping a lot of marine fish to the United States, which they’re not. They’re shipping a lot of freshwater fish.”
In fact, only 52 percent of commercial invoices matched the government import forms.


There is another business, investigating specific categories of trade data to verify it for people depending on it. Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.


There Is No Art Without Competition

Here are a few quotes form Paul Gauguin:


“In art, one idea is as good as another. If one takes the idea of trembling, for instance, all of a sudden most art starts to tremble. Michelangelo starts to tremble. El Greco starts to tremble. All the Impressionists start to tremble.”

This gets to people feeding off each other's ideas.  IPR seeks to stop art.

And

"Concentrate your strengths against your competitor's relative weaknesses."

This is innovation, serving the customer, and division of labor.

And

"Stressing output is the key to improving productivity, while looking to increase activity can result in just the opposite."


Being an employee the key is to increase activity.  Self-employed the key is improving productivity


Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.


Sasha Checks in On IPR Piracy

A poet, Neil Gaiman, who has come to love internet copyright "piracy" is given an honorary doctorate by an Arts school.  You IPR lawyers, better start looking for a another career, the rent-seeking is going to end...

I recommend this 20 minute video because it is a poet saying exactly what I say.  I find it appalling that if falls to me to be the one who speaks the truth on business and markets.  I'd gladly stop if someone else could do it better.  I am not the best at what I do, but I am the only one.  He is talking specifically to artists, but it is the same message.



How what this poet teaches would help bookstores I covered with  another 4 minute video at my other website...

Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.


Thursday, May 24, 2012

Bullying and IPR

Isn't the heart of IPR simply bullying?


Hi John,
Re: protecting intellectual property rights, I thought I might relate this little personal tale  of woe.
A couple of years ago, I had made contact with a Chinese company that produced what is called bjd’s or ball jointed dolls.  Originally developed in Japan, these are 10”-14” resin dolls which are fully articulated with 9-14 ball joints and have distinctive animee like faces.  They come either blank (owner adds eyes, wig and clothes) or fully painted and dressed.   They range in prices from $300 and on up into the thousands.
This particular Chinese company was selling a blank 10” doll for $60 a piece.  I ordered ten, had a workshop in my doll studio for five participants…I painted two for myself and had a few left over.  I decided to list them on Ebay for $90 each, and just listed them as “blank” bjd’s.
I got bids on two, but then one day I got an email from a bjd collector who advised me to check a blog site popular among bjd owners called Den of Angels.  It was an “invitation only” blog site.
There I found a lively exchange about my selling these 10” dolls on Ebay.  The comments were vitriolic.  I was accused of being a thief and selling copies of a doll I never heard of…a “YoSD”.  Some were calling for my being blacklisted on Ebay. Others wanted the Japanese company to sue me!  Since I could not defend myself on that site ( surprise…surprise… I never did get an invitation)  I contacted the person who originally warned me.   
She was very helpful and after discussions with her and a  lot of research I found out that the company I was ordering from actually produced the 10” dolls for the original "YoSD" brand-label  in Japan and then marketed the exact same doll, but without the “YoSD” label.  The collectors on DOA were upset because, as they claimed, I knew the dolls were copies of the Japanese original, that I was selling them as originals at reduced prices and that this was under-cutting the value of their expensive dolls.
I contacted my lawyer and she assured me (and I in turn related this to my email benefactor) that I was not doing anything illegal, because I was not claiming MY dolls were the “YoSD” dolls.   In good faith, however, I removed the listings from Ebay.
To this day, I feel that I was bullied into losing those sales.  But I fought back a little…I told the woman who originally emailed me to let her blog cronies know that I would sue them and DOA for slander/libel  if the comments did not stop.  A bit of blustering on my part, but the comments stopped.  


OEMs make items for everyone.  Bang & Olufsen 42" Plasma screen tvs are made by panasonic.  This example nothing remotely wrong was done, but the mindset behind IPR is bullying people, as we see so often.

Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.


I Am Abused From Italy


On May 23, 2012, at 5:10 PM, A.M.A. wrote:
 Get a hint...it ain't happening in this lifetime.

***I the free market anarchist was classified 1O by the draft board, the state cannot use me for fear of my ideas...  what little I have paid into leviathan in taxes I'll get back in 2.5 years if I ever bother to collect...  the little I have paid in because I know as an anarchist taxes are voluntary in USA, by law.  I am not sure one can live an ethical happy life unless one is a free market anarchist.***

And by the way...you ole Papist...what's with this nihil obstat and imprimatur horse XXXX.

***One ought to answer to the religion to which one is called.  Even atheism.***

And how come you have to have a XXXX to be in the power elite.  

***The church does not have the authority to ordain women.  Jesus may give it to someone else, but not the Church. Not sure why.***

Jesus went into the temple twice in his life.  

***At least three times that we know of***

Once when he was a kid and let all the old circumcised xxxxs know it was his Pa they were talkin' about...and he knew a lot more about his Pa than they did. Time two was when he kicked out all the money changers.  How much interest does the Vatican bank charge?
***Usury is forbidden, not interest.  There is some confusion as to terms.  And as long as Visa is getting money at less than 1% and charging 20% interest, the confusion among the lads down at Banco Vaticano is likely to continue.
And the third time at the temple when he paid a tax he deemed blasphemous, by performing a  miracle.  It's a miracle if you pay taxes.***

John


Corporate Personhood and Progressive Movement

One of the evil manifestations of the capitalist system is the corporation.  That which is a good idea in a free market becomes monstrous in capitalism.  Like insurance, wonderful in a free market, is monstrous in a capitalist system.

The progressive are aflutter on the topic of corporate personhood, because blah blah blah... it really does not matter what they say, because the problem is not corporate personhood in capitalism, the problem is capitalism.  The progressives have no intention of ending capitalism, or even tweaking it much.  The capitalists have accommodated the progressives, hired them to man the commanding heights, and to load the cattle cars with people and man the railroad switching yards.  They've got the religions and the healthcare, the universities and the social services.  They've got the media, where they study every facet of "gay marriage" and work every conceivable angle to the end of ginning up some controversy to keep some sort of creative tension in a life deadened by dronism.  As long as people are talking "gay marriage" they are not talking "war crimes."

Progressives talk "gay marriage" while the capitalists rape, pillage and burn.

Progress is not in tweaking "corporate personhood" progress will be relieving ourselves of the legal patterns and practices that have buried the free market law and governance.  If we take off the rubble from the disastrous experiment in capitalism, we'd find free market law and governance that would give us more better cheaper faster without fascism and pollution.

But who among the progressives wants to pick through rubble of capitalism, clear it away?  They've got their sinecure because of capitalism. They hardly want change.  They do not know how to work, and they are not about to start now, just as the free pension money starts rolling in.   It is no surprise that the occupy movement has gone nowhere. Progressives lead it.  Progressives are to the regime today what the clergy was to the regime in France, circa 1788.  Why bother with change?  Everything is very good as it is!

Let the dead bury the dead.  If anyone really does wants change, we can use a hand over here in the free markets.  You'll get paid for your work.

Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.


Wednesday, May 23, 2012

How Is This Relevant to Us?

There is no case to be made for the existence of the state.  None.



What goes around comes around...

What is it about uniforms that makes people monsters?



Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.


Note To Employers - Save Your Business


Note to employers whose employees are now acting like vendors, not employees, like you are not an employer, you are a client.  Thank your lucky stars.  Let me explain why.

The debt load you took on in boom times cannot be supported by the lower sales volume and tighter margins you have now during the bust.  So you are cutting employee costs, rebalancing inventory, renegotiating the lease, and cutting overhead.  Everyone has a different weighting in these areas, so its all about judgment.

If you are like many businesses you’ve by now fired your high priced, boom time help and replaced them with low priced help.   You’ve cashed in your 401K and paid the tax and penalty to make up for the loss of the bank line of credit.  You await the promised economic recovery, when you can replenish your stores.

If you own a restaurant you have at least one chef working for free.  It is called staging.  For the restaurant to be open, and minimum wage paid (and not just work for tips) someone has to work for free.  It is the poor bastard who has a chef degree and a student loan, who is working for free hoping somewhere, sometime a chef drops dead.  Since working for free is illegal, these chefs move on, pretending to be "guest cheffing."  

As you know "interning" is quite widespread, but the politicians made it illegal about 3 years ago.  And they exempted politicians and lawyers.  I am not making this up.

In any event, you are doing what you have to do until the economic recovery comes.

There is no economic recovery coming.  We are in year five of a 30 year rolling disaster, which will get far worse.  There is simply no way, for lack or perspicacity AND concern, that any public policy will address any aspect of the economic crisis.  This is not to say your business cannot do better. There is business out there, but you need to change to get that business.  And you need good people to make it happen.  Such people are hard to find, or impossible, it would seem, to afford.

If you are looking at other people in business as your competitors, you are looking in the wrong direction.  They are in the same boat you are.  He who will eat your lunch has not yet started a business.  He will beat you because the workers will all be owners, their rent will be dirt cheap, they will have no debt obligations to service, and they will likely get vendor financing for customers they serve with better product at a lower cost. They will not be flogging dead inventory.

This competitor may be working for you right now.  Your impulse may be to fire this person when you find him going all entrepreneurial on you, treating you like a client, but you may be better off listening and working with this person.  Listen to the person’s ideas, and between the two of you you may pull your business out of the death spiral.

Now, you may look around the low priced help you have, or whoever you have on staff, and say, no such person here.  And creative, smart aggressive energetic people are too expensive to hire right now.  Right?

Wrong!  Again, you are stuck in old thinking.

Your business like all other has a series of posters on the wall outlining how the state, as a matter of public policy, has interfered in the rights of employers and employees to negotiate any deal they like.  Public policy is meant to curb the excesses of the capitalist system with rules and regulations.  Never mind that if a system engenders excesses we should dump the system, get rid of capitalism, but no. Keeping capitalism alive is necessary for progressives to have something to do.  It may not have mattered when the economy was growing, but it is counterproductive right now.  Public policy no longer fits within economic reality.  The economic reality is we cannot afford any playing at "public policy."  In any event, the trick is to not be duped into confining you thinking within the limits of public policy.

Public policy is for employers to be a welfare agent for employees from cradle to grave.  Your parents’ employers took care of you from the cradle, and your employer is to care for you to the grave.  Of course people change jobs, but laws such as COBRA provide for seamless transition.  It is all so out of touch with economic reality.  A huge solution to a tiny problem.  Costs on top of pointless costs.

A new conception of "employee"  (ick... I don't like the word...) may prove to help align production with reality, but may also be one heck of a competitive advantage.  A network of associates who show up for an hour and earn $1000 to produce $10,000 in sales is better than a full time employee who costs $5000 a month and produces $40,000 in sales.  You get better performance from the former and there is a mountain of management costs for the latter. Full timers tend to equate time with entitlement, and an idle mind is the devil's workshop. 

If so, where to farm new recruits?

There is massive unemployment out there, even when people who would be working are hanging out in school or otherwise diverting themselves.  Uncertainty alone may forbid hiring.  Inability to contract on terms mutually agreeable makes sure you do not hire anyone new.  Forget about them.  They want to be employees and cannot help you.

I once wanted to learn about ag exports so I spent a year in Wenatchee picking, sorting, storing, packing fruit in Wenatchee, and then consulting with a couple of big outfits on ag exports.  The farmer I initially worked for told me the Mexicans ask for a certain wage, and his reply was "it's not in the fruit."  The meaning being, there was only so much he could make off the fruit, and that determined what he could pay.  At some point, it was better to lease his 30 acres out to big bad Dovex who got its money cheaper and was big enough to rock the subsidies.

Paying employees in your business is not in the plate or the furniture or the clothes.

There are some people stepping outside the box.  You’ll see them appearing to compete with you, either inside your company or out.  Or they may have other gigs in which they are more interested in than yours, but their creativity may serve you.  Bring them on as consultants, or in a way that you get your $10,000 in sales, and they get $1000, but only for one hours work.  Match the personnel to the opportunity.

These people do not want bennies, they dread mandatory "health care."  The thing is a literal killer on many levels, but in short, they don't want to pay for something they will never use.  They made separate arrangements for "health care" to stay healthy.  They want no retirement because it would not occur to them to retire.  They will never collect unemployment because it would not occur to them to be unemployed, which is always a voluntary circumstance.  When you are talking to people, listen.  Don't wonder if they would be a good employee.  Wonder under what conditions they will work WITH you.  The employee is over.

Competition means to strive with, not fight against.  How can you work with these lives wires in a way that benefits you both?

One final thing.  Most people are out of business before they realize it.  Get cold blooded about your situtation.  Have your CPA advise you when your liabilities grow to the point where you can go bankrupt and end up with nothing but $125,000 (what you get to keep in bankruptcy)  If you get there, go no farther.  Cash it all in.

Reflect on this.  What if you had absolutely no obligations, knew what you know, and had $125,000 to start over?  No worries except the business you want to build, from scratch.  The other people in the business, who have not gone bankrupt will remain shellshocked, dispirited, struggling full of woe.  You will be trim, fit, tanned and ready to rock.

The people you are really up against, the ones who will eat your lunch, are right there,  absolutely no obligations, no worries except the business they want to build, from scratch.  They are trim, fit, tanned and ready to rock, except for the experience and $125,000.  You have the advantage of experience and cash.  Doesn’t that sound pretty good place to be?  It is an option, study it.

Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.


Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Tale of Two Ag Exporters

As a part of the Stalinization of USA in the 1930s, fruit commissions were set up by law to force  growers to pay into funds to "promote" their products.  There are blueberry commissions, hops commissions, and apple commissions.

From the Washington State Apple Commission website:


The Washington State Apple Advertising Commission was created by an act of the Washington State Legislature in 1937 at the request of the apple industry, making it one of the oldest and largest commodity commissions in the United States.
Under statutory authority, the Commission collects a mandatory assessment levied against all fresh apple shipments. ...
The assessment rate is established by a referendum of commercial apple growers in the state, and remains at the same level yearly until changed by growers. Since 1937, growers have increased the assessment 13 times from its original 1 cent per box to as high as 40 cents per 42-lb box. Then in 2003 a lawsuit restructured the Commission and at this time the assessment is 3.5 cents per box.


Well, "created at the request of SOME in the industry" would be a more accurate description.  The benefits of advertising inure to the leader.  When Royal Crown Cola advertises, people get thirsty for Coke.  When the Washington State Apple Commission promotes, the biggest gets the benefit.

The commission was collecting about $20 million per year in box fees and with some 40 employees, had about $500,000 for each employee to burn through.  Partay!

Ag trade is an instrument of USA foreign policy, and is heavily subsidized and controlled to serve USA foreign policy.  There are also regulations to keep the prices high.

In Wenatchee Washington there were two leading apple growers/exporters, Dovex and Stemilt.

Dovex rocked the programs offered by the government, and Stemilt went its own way.  One manifestation was the Apple Commission required all Washington State Apples carry a Washington State apple tag.  This hurt small growers and helped Dovex.  Stemilt went its own way, marking its apples simply Stemilt, the tag looking like a ladybug.

That 2003 lawsuit was about paying that assessment, and when the commission sued its members for payment, the courts backed the forced-members, and now the 3.5 cent assessment is essentially voluntary, with the commission funding largely federal export promotion dollars.  Everyone not benefitting got out, which was most growers.

After 2003, marketing and promotion mattered, not "rocking the programs."  And by 2010, Stemilt acquired Dovex, because Stemilt knew how to operate in a free market, and Dovex, not so well.

Stay away form government programs, pursue independence.

Feel free to forward this to three friends.


Monday, May 21, 2012

Eschew Perfect Beauty

In the UK they held a contest for perfect beauty and the winner was a 19 year old girl who had the perfect face.  By scientific standards, whatever that is.

Now I am sure everyone would agree that the girl is pretty.  And those who measure such things say the measurements are near perfect, space between the eyes, eyes in relation to cheekbones, etc...  But take a look at her and what you see is, well, so what, this is the best science can do?

The paradox is for breathtaking beauty, there must be a flaw, a lesson every designer must learn, or knows intuitively. Here are ten beauties, you know them, and their flaws:


Forehead too big in relation to the eyes.


Yikes.. the ears!



Cheekbones out of proportion.


Lips... sheeesh...


Huge eyes!


Teeth!

 Not the best picture, but she has two different eyes.


This women is not beautiful by most standards, but standards have to be set aside to accommodate her beauty.  And I am not just saying that cuz she is mostly Celt.

Some girls worry they are ugly for some flaw.  The above beauties rock the flaw, and move into the realm of exceptional.

You get the point... true beauty of flawed, so it is interesting.  Perfect gets boring.  Never aspire to perfection.  That last few points costs more than anyone can afford.

Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.


An Education Now Means Unemployment

We've crossed the line when the majority of the unemployed also have college education.  And it is accelerating, because the community colleges are packing them in, and forming waiting lists.  So it is a simple fact that in the majority of cases and education equals unemployment.

The cost is not what an education costs, the costs reflect school spending, which is wildly out of control. The second largest reason California is in trouble financially is likely its college system.  The first is its prison system. The first arrests people for smoking dope, the second arrests dupes for trying to be not dopes.

Now the schools are not expanding to meet need because they must suppress demand for education.  But by charter the community colleges must accept all registrants. How do they manage these conflicting goals?  First, they keep the classroom size small, so fewer people can actually take the classes.  The result is it takes more years, approaching 3 and 4, to get into all of the classes necessary to get your AA degree.  Second hire gypsy instructors to teach at $30 an hour.  These are people with PHDs, but never got tenure, and to whom it has not occurred to find other work.  Why only gypsy instructors?  They never get enough teaching load to qualify for bennies, so the state can keep the cost down.

Some of these teachers go all entrepreneurial on the system like they think they are self-employed or something, and manage to get a full load, three courses in one quarter, by picking up one contract to teach one class at Community College district A, another contract to teach one class at Community College district  B, another contract to teach one class at Community College district C.  The three districts are independently managed, but all within driving distance of each other.  After three quarters of this, the scheming instructor shows up at the State Community College offices to enroll himself, as required by law, onto the benefits rolls.  Ka-ching!

Now the schools make gypsy instructors sign affidavits that they are NOT teaching anywhere else.   I will say though, having had a daughter who just blew through an AA degree and then went into an major university, she said she often found community college instructors superior to the university instructors.  A full phd teaching 30 students at a community college can be far superior to an ABD teaching 300 students at a university.  Since I come from a family of academics, and happen to have an MA in Ed Admin, the stories she tells me reveal that the politicians are making the shortfall felt in the classroom where the students are.  It is standard operating procedure for state, when faced with budget shortfalls, to point the knife at the heart and not the fat.  With the knife poised at the heart, the state tells people, "raise taxes or we cut the heart out, there is no choice."  Never, ever, do they say, "well, we can cut some fat, like the EXIMBank."  Never.  The reason is the voter never catches on. Never.  They ever fall for the false dilemma.

Student loans are feeding the "private colleges" so the colleges are flush keeping people off the unemployment lines.  If you are in school you are not unemployed.  A very self-serving way the state counts things.

Mish Shedlock offers a five-point plan for reform.

   1. Kill federally funded student loan program entirely. Student loans do nothing but drive up the cost of education. 

***Great investment advice.***

Anyone can get a student loan because the loans are guaranteed and cannot be discharged in bankruptcy. The beneficiaries of this horrendous setup are teachers and administrators, not the kids receiving loans.

***Poor analysis...  teachers and admin have eaten their seed corn, and the granaries are empty.  They face a grim future as the very politicians who so readily sold the gullible taxpayer down the river will now repudiate the debt.***

2. Kill state aid to colleges as well

*** Great investment advice.***

3. Increase competition by accrediting more online universities, even foreign universities. This will drive down costs immensely.

***Lousy policy advice.  They already have accredited more online universities and foreign schools, and this made matters far worse and costs far higher. Accreditation is the Berlin Wall of education.  A four year liberal arts degree superior to anything Harvard of Stanford offers would cost no more than $24,000 over the four years in a free market.  Therefore no accreditation is even needed to parse out to whom taxpyer slush may flow, and studenmts need no loans since anyone can come up with $6K a year for education.***

4. Public unions are a huge part of the reason for driving up teacher salaries, so collective bargaining (collective coercion actually), must end.

*** Yes, PUBLIC unions are house unions, and house unions are to labor what naked short selling is to the stock market: criminal self-dealing that is accepted in practice.  I think a teachers union would likely be necessary if there was a switch to the free market in educaiton, but since the state would be out of education, a house union is not feasible.  Problem solved.***

5. High school counselors and parents must educate kids that there simply are no realistic chances for those graduating with degrees in political science, history, English, art, and literally dozens of other useless or nearly-useless majors.

****Arrrrgggghhh.. dead wrong!  Mish seems to have the evil state conceit that the point of education is to get a job.  The state is relentless in this becaise it wants drones paying taxes. The point of an education is to be happy, to live a fuller life.  I have three daughters, each faced my wrath when they suggested getting an educaiton that would lead to work.  The eldest has a comparative religion degree, the middle is a latin scholar, and the last is an english major.  All three are employed and have standing offers for work, while their peers, with their business, science and computer degrees are unemployed adults paying for food with their EBT cards.  And sweating student loan defaults.  My children have no student loans, another suggestion that meets with my wrath.  Parents ought to go ballistic is a child suggests they want to waste 4 years preparing to work.  Those years should be spent learning about the bigger world, so the life of the mind grows ever more large and wealthy.***

If we deregulated something, anything, all those people would be employed instead of contributing to the downward spiral of our economy and society with it.  Deregulate education, medicine, wall street... anything.

I have two .pdfs I am happy to send to anyone.  One is a biz plan for a billion dollar business that would reform education.  Feel free to steal my ideas and make a billion.  The second is an an outline on how to teach and write your way to paid publication, that is to distinguish yourself as a teacher and a write.  You do not need a degree to teach noncredit classes at the college level, and the pay is about $100 per contact hour.  Email me if you want more info.

Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.


Sunday, May 20, 2012

Donna Summer - Singen auf Deutsch

Did you know the late great Donna Summer was fluent in German?  And the lead singer in the original German production of Hair?  Her voice is unmistakable - clear as a bell...  wenn der Mond im siebten Hauser stadt





Kudos to Paul Heubl...  Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.


Start-up Motivation


The reason I emphasize customers first, literally, as in “get your idea in front of a customer first” is that it tests the motivation for the business start-up.  If your motivation is awry, you will go off track.

I teach what it took me ten years to figure out while I was working for others, what thrives is the business that serves others by solving a problem.  all products and services are a solution to a problem, there is no problem that cannot be improved upon.  Wealth is not money in the bank, it is access to goods and services.  Only the free market can offer ever widening array of goods and services, while ever lowering cost of access thereto.  A free market gives us more better cheaper faster of anything new. Capitalism and communism are both about concentration of economic power, love of money, the root of all evil.

But the individual actor matters, as does his motivation.

if the motivation is serve others by solving a problem, the individual has a fighting chance in starting a business.

Self-employment is terrifying.  it gets to the fear acted out in 1 Samuel 8, “please give us a king to fight our battles for us.  We’ll give up our freedom for that, we’ll take endless abuse and misery for that.”

Not everybody wants that deal.  Self-employment is the path out, the necessary personal transformation from pointless servitude to meaningful servitude.

The key motivation in business start up is passion (to suffer) over an problem you experience in a field you love, and then the test is do you find joy working on the solution as it relates to customers?

After quite a while of trying to figure out why people do not just leave their jobs and start their own company, I finally figured out at least one reason why not: security.  

That sad part is it took me a long time to figure out the obvious.   sigh.  hence, I conceived of the theme of these last few weeks, start-up the personal transformation in the job you are secure in presently.  Thus the blog entries below...

What very well ought to happen pretty quickly, even “going native” while employed by another, is you’ll act out on your motivations.  So while on the boss’s dime, you begin to act as though you are self -employed.  And as such, watch your motivations.  I see some common themes in motivations:

1. “I just want to make enough to cover my lifestyle and enjoy the work.  X looks fun.”  So the idea is to pick a business where others seem to be doing well, and do it too.  Two problems, “seems” and “is” are two different things.  In this day and age of the tax loopholes, money laundering and subsidy, you cannot know what the reality is behind the facade.  Read any of hundreds of examples of people opening coffee shops, only to find themselves descending into misery.  Hint: cash businesses are often in fact just money laundering operations.  If you are not laundering money, you are likely not going to survive.

Essentially, this is “me too.” What is missing in this scenario is the “how come” in relation to a customer.

2.  Hitch a cart to a star.  This is where you get in on the ground floor starting a business with the next Bill Gates or Steve Jobs.  Your chances are better with lottery tickets. Certainly partnerships thrive better faster than sole proprietors, but “thrive” is relative.  In any event, where is the customer in this scenario?

3. Front running is to find an existing product and imagine that it would do well in another market.  “If i get there firstest with the mostest, I’ll clean up.“ Again, lottery tickets are a better bet.  Your effort will be 837,958,0581,295th attempt to introduce that item in the new market.  Everybody has tried what you thought up. And you too will find out what everyone else learned: how come not.  The motivation is not customer, it is quick “success.”

4. Pseudo-charity.  People who want to start a business to help some people somewhere on the earth, “preserve their culture.”  Usually they will specifically state they are forming a nonprofit.  Two problems: there is no one anywhere who desires to “preserve their culture.”  Everyone wants to move upward and onward, and very often they want what you got: iPhones and coca cola.  The last thing they want is to keep making baskets and hunting monkeys with spears.  

What they do want, is to redesign to serve a wealthy market so they can personally transform themselves in any way that they want.

These pseudo-charities are actually just a consumer item, something else to own.  “I’ve got the waterfront home, the benzie and the land rover, I’ve got ritalin for my kids, I’m part owner of a winery, I’ve got a nonprofit preserving a culture overseas, I’ve got a health club membership... and so on.

The irony is it is the for-profit businesses that actually transform the world along peaceful and prosperous lines, and the NGOs are the agents of death and destruction.  See Maren, the Road to Hell.


5.  If I just made a killing, my life would be happy.  Lottery tickets work on this motivation, and most people know the lottery thing will never pay off.  In this the studying markets and data is endless.  Trying to find the needle in the haystack, trying to find the next big thing, and jumping on it.  In this the assumption is one is so smart they can think their way to success.  You can only serve your way to success in the free market.

6. The final ill-motivation is the catch-all, entitlement.  In this one is motivated by a sense that for whatever reason, race, class, education, messianic complex, whatever, one just deserves to win at business.  This is the easiest to do and the hardest to spot.

But this, like the other ill-motivations, is smoked out instantly when your idea meets the customers.  If that meeting goes badly, then you may reflect on this possibilities as the possible impediment.

In any event, the positive action of listening to your customer and adjusting to his demands will still push you forward.  But overcoming the personal ill- motivations and converting to the more realistic and happier basis is the challenge.  The most important thing in business is the customer, the hardest thing is the product.  It is hardest because the product reflects you and your motivations.

Did I miss ill-motivations you have spotted?

Feel free to forward this by email to three of your friends.